Joined
·
69 Posts
So I'm strongly considering the GTL. I'm happy with my current LT (as I was with my former LT), but I'm always up for the next best thing BMW has to offer; more power, new exhilaration, upgraded features and...style. But unfortunately, I have some reservations, and here they are...
First off, my wife rides with me about 50% of the time. She loves the accommodations on the LT, but doesn't care for the rear of the GTL. Let's admit it; it's not LT plush, there's no audio controls, less fairing/windscreen means more wind pressure/moisture on her and it's sort of 'spartan' back there. The outward presentaion is somewhat lack luster considering it's a BMW and not a Moto Guzzi, the rear top box looks like it's an aftermarket meant for a Vespa, the previous GT's had far better streamlined bodies and swanky looks, the optional 'Frankenstein boltz' LED driving lights look like they need to be treated with clearasil, after having back surgery a electro/hydraulic center stand would be peachy, not that excited to go back to a 1988 turn signal switch (really?), no reverse, iPod/iPhone connection issues already?, the third brake light's an option?, the GPS unit is reported by new owners to be positioned 'too far forward', unincorporated mirrors that are said to be very small while coupled with the lack of hand protection, back to the old-style urine specimen cups on the handlebars...I'll stop nit picking now.
So it's been said that this isn't the replacement for the LT. I'd have to fully agree with that. The GT's are a new benchmark for the two-wheeled world. They will take BMW into the next generation as the continued leader of motorcycle innovation. But then I read exerpts from the new-ish Motorrad CEO Klauss Von Dontwannatour, he issues his convoluted statements making you very confused as to the future of BMW and luxury touring. Apparently, the new GT's are as far as he feels that BMW needs to go in the world of full touring - a segment that really personified BMW as the bike to lead progessive thinking and excitement in 'Touring' (if you're just not into the Oldwing). I sort of feel like BMW had all of these technological advances, an awesome motor, got the testing out of the way and sent the GT's into production not taking other ancestral factors into consideration. The heritage of any Motorrad Ultimate Driving Machine is the aforementioned qualities plus...gorgeous beauty. If I wanted to drive a bike that looked a lot like a GS Adventurer, I'd buy one.
The positives of the GTL are overwhelming and that's obviously why I'm wanting to make the switch. I have two BMW vehicles that have sweet in-line sixes, and one in their bike is simply bliss. If they'd squeeze it into a new LT-type unit, I'd be at total inner peace
Please don't get me wrong, I am a BMW faithful and I like pretty much whatever they build. But I do sometimes question their strategy and vision.
Ok guys, rip me a new one.
First off, my wife rides with me about 50% of the time. She loves the accommodations on the LT, but doesn't care for the rear of the GTL. Let's admit it; it's not LT plush, there's no audio controls, less fairing/windscreen means more wind pressure/moisture on her and it's sort of 'spartan' back there. The outward presentaion is somewhat lack luster considering it's a BMW and not a Moto Guzzi, the rear top box looks like it's an aftermarket meant for a Vespa, the previous GT's had far better streamlined bodies and swanky looks, the optional 'Frankenstein boltz' LED driving lights look like they need to be treated with clearasil, after having back surgery a electro/hydraulic center stand would be peachy, not that excited to go back to a 1988 turn signal switch (really?), no reverse, iPod/iPhone connection issues already?, the third brake light's an option?, the GPS unit is reported by new owners to be positioned 'too far forward', unincorporated mirrors that are said to be very small while coupled with the lack of hand protection, back to the old-style urine specimen cups on the handlebars...I'll stop nit picking now.
So it's been said that this isn't the replacement for the LT. I'd have to fully agree with that. The GT's are a new benchmark for the two-wheeled world. They will take BMW into the next generation as the continued leader of motorcycle innovation. But then I read exerpts from the new-ish Motorrad CEO Klauss Von Dontwannatour, he issues his convoluted statements making you very confused as to the future of BMW and luxury touring. Apparently, the new GT's are as far as he feels that BMW needs to go in the world of full touring - a segment that really personified BMW as the bike to lead progessive thinking and excitement in 'Touring' (if you're just not into the Oldwing). I sort of feel like BMW had all of these technological advances, an awesome motor, got the testing out of the way and sent the GT's into production not taking other ancestral factors into consideration. The heritage of any Motorrad Ultimate Driving Machine is the aforementioned qualities plus...gorgeous beauty. If I wanted to drive a bike that looked a lot like a GS Adventurer, I'd buy one.
The positives of the GTL are overwhelming and that's obviously why I'm wanting to make the switch. I have two BMW vehicles that have sweet in-line sixes, and one in their bike is simply bliss. If they'd squeeze it into a new LT-type unit, I'd be at total inner peace
Please don't get me wrong, I am a BMW faithful and I like pretty much whatever they build. But I do sometimes question their strategy and vision.
Ok guys, rip me a new one.