BMW Luxury Touring Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Crude Oil Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the BMW Luxury Touring Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Jan 7th, 2008 7:35 pm
tbarstow
Crude OIL

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironbuttwannabe
Why does the government invest money in Ethanol when it drives up the price of corn so much? And it is also not very efficient. If they threw as much money at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...02_pigoil.html as they do Ethanol plants we would all be better off.

I like numbers. But I just figured, with their conversion, that our farm could produce around 100,000 gallons of crude oil/year. Which is about 2,380 barrels of oil. And we are a small farm.

I just don't see how Ethanol is going to solve anything.
It breaks down to too many tree huggers that know just enough to be dangerous and someone in the government being able to make a lot of money in the deal. Same reason why recycling will never really catch on to the point where it can be really profitable.

Same deal with putting MTBE in the gas (turns it blue, it won't evaporate, eats gaskets, takes 25-30% more fuel to do the same work) to make it "greener."
Jan 7th, 2008 12:22 pm
joegottberg
Monica ? ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalLT
But you are right that the current administration would never support it, for other, obvious reasons. I'm pretty sure I don't need to spell out those reasons.
Well she wasn't THAT MUCH OF A PIG
Jan 7th, 2008 10:53 am
CalLT
Quote:
Originally Posted by phydough
No way is the government going to support something like that.

Pig guts is a whole lot like people guts and it wouldn't be long
before folks were 'brewing' their own.

How would they tax that.
My guess is that growing and manufacturing your own would be pretty tough for the average Joe.

But you are right that the current administration would never support it, for other, obvious reasons. I'm pretty sure I don't need to spell out those reasons.
Jan 7th, 2008 10:45 am
phydough No way is the government going to support something like that.

Pig guts is a whole lot like people guts and it wouldn't be long
before folks were 'brewing' their own.

How would they tax that.
Jan 7th, 2008 10:41 am
AliMar
Quote:
Originally Posted by joegottberg
I think they use Sugar Cane instead of corn.
It's called Cachaca.
Jan 7th, 2008 10:17 am
joegottberg
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalLT
It seems to be having a big affect in Brazil. How do THEY make it work? Govt. subsidies?
I think they use Sugar Cane instead of corn.

Seems to be much more efficient in producing ethanol. They've had 30 years trying to optimize.
Jan 7th, 2008 10:16 am
CalLT Never mind. Answered my own question here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil
Jan 7th, 2008 10:01 am
CalLT
Quote:
Originally Posted by ironbuttwannabe
Why does the government invest money in Ethanol when it drives up the price of corn so much? And it is also not very efficient. If they threw as much money at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...02_pigoil.html as they do Ethanol plants we would all be better off.

I like numbers. But I just figured, with their conversion, that our farm could produce around 100,000 gallons of crude oil/year. Which is about 2,380 barrels of oil. And we are a small farm.

I just don't see how Ethanol is going to solve anything.
It seems to be having a big affect in Brazil. How do THEY make it work? Govt. subsidies?
Jan 7th, 2008 9:14 am
Woolly Would that only be used by HOG riders ?
Jan 7th, 2008 9:01 am
ATFLT It just makes it look like they are trying something so they get the public off their back. It will likely be quite a while before the government does anything that really does some good for the oil situation.
Jan 4th, 2008 2:23 pm
AliMar
heavy stink crude...

Now that's a switch on light sweet crude... this could be considered heavy stink crude.
Jan 4th, 2008 1:14 pm
ironbuttwannabe
Crude Oil

Why does the government invest money in Ethanol when it drives up the price of corn so much? And it is also not very efficient. If they threw as much money at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...02_pigoil.html as they do Ethanol plants we would all be better off.

I like numbers. But I just figured, with their conversion, that our farm could produce around 100,000 gallons of crude oil/year. Which is about 2,380 barrels of oil. And we are a small farm.

I just don't see how Ethanol is going to solve anything.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome