Importance of battery amp/hours - BMW Luxury Touring Community
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 Old Jan 2nd, 2008, 10:15 am Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Redlands, CA, USA
Posts: 439
Importance of battery amp/hours

A number of members recommend the Odyssey PC 680 as a replacement for the factory gel cell. The PC-680 has 17 amp/hours while the original battery had 20 amp/hours. How important is it to match the original 20 amp/hours? Are there other factors that are involved that make the amp/hours unimportant? Thanks
BEhrler is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old Jan 2nd, 2008, 2:13 pm
Senior Member
 
Zotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Casper, WY, USA
Posts: 1,742
A 20A/hr battery will run for 3 hours longer at one amp draw (in theory at least) than a 17A/h battery.

What's important for a start battery is the CCA value. Can the battery in question deliver the amperage at design voltage needed to start the engine reliably and repeatedly? And have some reserve for hard start situations? There are a whole boat load of other factors come into play. Charge level, ambient temps, oil, etc, etc. But the CCA number is a better value to consider for comparing starting batteries than A/hrs

The attraction of the Odysee is it's ability to survive deep discharge as well as operate near the norms of a conventional lead/acid setup. Most LA setups, if deeply discharged (left those lights on? Turned the key to far when parking again, eh? or like me - left all the radio gear running.) will degrade their ability to provide sufficient amperage at design voltage for starting. Do that enough times and you've a toxic paper weight. I've collected several.

I've been using a 17A/hr rated battery for better part of 3 years now - no issues at all. I've run it totally dead many severals of times too (those pesky radios!) and it still keeps on going. The 'traditional' LA battery I used to have "died" totally on me after the 3rd accidental deep discharge. That's when I started looking for an alternative.

Marine style batteries - like those used for trolling motors - are designed for deep discharge, but they don't supply the short durration, high amperage power needed for starting - well. They'll do it a few times, but it degrades the battery for deep discharge. Kind of the reverse of a traditional starter battery.

The Odysee is designed to do both - deep discharge AND high Amp starts - reasonably well. It doesn't do either as well as a single purpose battery might - but it does do both better than a either type of single purpose could.

So, if you're after maximum CCA or you're after maximum A/hr - each of those qualities are aimed at different duties. Choice is good!!

Me? I want my bike to start in spite of my in-attention to a couple extra switches and my laziness at not installing a 'cut-off' relay - yet. So far - it's done very well for me.

Tate

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

02 Mauve - my 'Light Truck'
Wyoming Immigration Officer, Cyberhiway tour guide and
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Zotter is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old Jan 2nd, 2008, 2:21 pm
Senior Member
 
mtrevelino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA, USA
Posts: 2,552
I had the pc680 and felt that it did not "fast" crank the engine as the original battery. A few years later I switched to the Westco 12V20P battery and it made a big difference in turning the engine over. The westco is rated at 20 AMP hour and has a CCA of 275, in which the pc680 is rated at 17 AMP hour and 220 CCA.

Mike Trevelino
Williamsburg, VA
2008 RT
2000 LT - Totaled at 99,960 miles


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mtrevelino is offline  
 
post #4 of 4 Old Jan 2nd, 2008, 2:53 pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 878
I have never used the Odyssey battery so I can't comment directly on its' merits. I have been using the Panasonic LCX1220P for the past year and a half and have been very pleased.

See this post for a recent battery update.

Res ipsa loquitur, sed quid in infernos dicet?

Alan Stuber
2003 K1200 LTC Titan Silver
Austin, Texas



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
astuber is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the BMW Luxury Touring Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'05 Lt Battery And Recharging With An Electronic Low Amps Tender ajs K1200LT 2 Apr 9th, 2007 11:11 am
I've tried to read everything on this site but I'm still confused kdale K1200LT 11 Jul 3rd, 2006 7:44 pm
Battery Concern please advise Hulkster Batteries, Chargers, & Electrical 8 Feb 6th, 2006 1:41 am
How NOT to treat your battery.... Zotter Batteries, Chargers, & Electrical 8 Nov 22nd, 2005 2:51 pm

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome