PDA

View Full Version : #1 and #2 ?


bowlesj
Nov 19th, 2006, 9:07 am
I know it's still a little early to tell. But, what do you guys think about the BCS teams. I firmly believe in the 2 best teams playing for the championship.

Why would anyone propose anything else?

I realize there is still a lot of ambiguity to setting the rankings, but if it comes out Michigan and OSU, let 'em roll.

I watched USC yesterday, ND several times this year, Florida once, and Ohio State should tromp on any of them except Michigan.

Arkansas would be the only team I'd be open to seeing ranked #2, but I still believe Michigan to be the stronger team.

Neither ND or USC could hold a candle to the top 2 Big Ten teams, even though ND has had some great finishes this season.

I'm just real glad Rutgers got bounced "cause that would have been a pathetic BCS Championship game if they had played the Bucks.

So, why is there a #2 controversy?

messenger13
Nov 19th, 2006, 9:49 am
I'm in full agreement my friend. MI is the only real contender for the national championship. USC sucks. Their coach is a little girl. :D

All I do know is that there are a lot of crappy college teams this year.

hoog62
Nov 19th, 2006, 9:49 am
The two best teams in the nation played yesterday, and IMO should play again in January.

Anybody who wouldn't want to see a rematch of yesterday's Michigan/ohio state game for the National Championship, must be a real homer....


Edit to add: Check out last nights Ohio State Lottery Pick 4 (http://www.ohiolottery.com/numbers/numbers.html) numbers. Weird.

TandemCyclist
Nov 19th, 2006, 8:45 pm
I Like the idea of MI and OH. I don't pay much attention to this stuff except to entertain my Dad, and Joe. USC might get lucky and beat Ohio (noted mostly for great roller coasters) , like O state beat Michigan. Let the lucky one get into the BCS bowl. Go Jimmy Johnson.