gholt417
Jul 30th, 2006, 7:47 pm
On Saturday's (30th July) Daily Mirror there was an article taking up two thirds of a page about a banned motorcyclist getting jailed for going through about 25 speed cameras in a couple of months (including 90mph past a school). Now okay, he deserved to be jailed but no one got hurt. Directly below the article, in a piece about two inches high, the paper reported on a thug who decided to race his mate in a car (both were in cars) and two people died. That thug got 7 years.
Now I am not complaining about the British justice system, but how can a newspaper decide that the motorcycle article is more important than someone who causes the deaths of two people? Somehow it don't seem right.
Any views anyone??
Graham
Now I am not complaining about the British justice system, but how can a newspaper decide that the motorcycle article is more important than someone who causes the deaths of two people? Somehow it don't seem right.
Any views anyone??
Graham