Reed
Jul 10th, 2006, 11:03 pm
Hi,
Newb horning in here. I know I'm sposed to lurk for a while but I don't have a while. Please indulge me. I'm in heat over the GS. My last bike (fourth overall) was a Harley Sturgis but it's been 20 years out of the game for me.
I always said if I got back in it would very likely be on a BMW. After a couple months of pondering it came to me that it was time to get back in. I ain't gettin any younger (56) and getting from here to there has become an absolute bore ... not to mention the disgust at those $80 fillups. I put 90% of my road miles in on easy country roads in the Texas Hill Country and I do a lot of back road exploring as a professional art photograher. I shoot landscapes and nature.
Obviously the GS is made for a guy like me. It would be sensible to go with a smaller bike but hey ... life is short. Big powerful bikes are fun. Getting to my question: I was all het up over the Gs Adventure but when I saw the GS in person I began to think the Adventure was a bridge too far.
The furthest afield I will ever probably go is a bad dirt/gravel road or the occasional well worn jeep trail through a rolling pasture. Though these will be regular fair. 200 miles will be top of my range and seldom further than 40 miles or so from a gas station. I like the idea of crash bars but these can be stuck on the regular GS. The big ole tank on the Adventure seems now to me like a disadvantage given my needs. The extra suspension travel will not be required.
What am I missing? Are my calculations correct? :bmw:
Newb horning in here. I know I'm sposed to lurk for a while but I don't have a while. Please indulge me. I'm in heat over the GS. My last bike (fourth overall) was a Harley Sturgis but it's been 20 years out of the game for me.
I always said if I got back in it would very likely be on a BMW. After a couple months of pondering it came to me that it was time to get back in. I ain't gettin any younger (56) and getting from here to there has become an absolute bore ... not to mention the disgust at those $80 fillups. I put 90% of my road miles in on easy country roads in the Texas Hill Country and I do a lot of back road exploring as a professional art photograher. I shoot landscapes and nature.
Obviously the GS is made for a guy like me. It would be sensible to go with a smaller bike but hey ... life is short. Big powerful bikes are fun. Getting to my question: I was all het up over the Gs Adventure but when I saw the GS in person I began to think the Adventure was a bridge too far.
The furthest afield I will ever probably go is a bad dirt/gravel road or the occasional well worn jeep trail through a rolling pasture. Though these will be regular fair. 200 miles will be top of my range and seldom further than 40 miles or so from a gas station. I like the idea of crash bars but these can be stuck on the regular GS. The big ole tank on the Adventure seems now to me like a disadvantage given my needs. The extra suspension travel will not be required.
What am I missing? Are my calculations correct? :bmw: